DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF
BUSINESS
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
SYLLABUS
MARKETING 6800
Innovation and New Product
Development
Fall 2002
|
Bill Moore |
MW 12:25-1:45PM |
|
Office: BuC 17 |
FAMB 205 |
|
Phone: 581-5023 (office) |
|
|
(435) 649-8859 (home) |
|
|
E-Mail MKTBM@BUSINESS.UTAH.EDU |
|
COURSE OBJECTIVES
This
course focuses on the process used to develop new and improved products and
services. Discussions consider,
marketing, operations, engineering, and management issues. Particular emphasis
will be given to the following topics:
·
Strategies to guide the
new product effort,
·
Managing product
development,
·
Ways to search for,
define, and evaluate new product opportunities,
·
Product development and
testing, and
·
New product launch.
PEDAGOGY
The course is case and
project oriented. Most class sessions
will be based on a discussion of the issues raised in that day's case(s). Additionally, students will work in a team
to develop a new product idea and a marketing plan.
READINGS
The assigned readings should be completed before the
class discussion of the topic. All
readings appear in the book of readings.
CLASS PARTICIPATION
GRADE
It is expected that you
will read and thoroughly evaluate each case. Your grade for class participation
is based on the quality of your discussion during these cases - both
when you are called upon and when you volunteer. Absences, for any reason, will result in a zero for that
day. This may be made up by handing in a two-page case write-up within
one week of the missed session or December 7 which ever comes first.
NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Teams of 3 to 5 students will work together to develop a
new product concept of their choosing, including drawings and/or model, as well
as a marketing plan. There will be
considerable freedom in what you do, but you must interview or observe some
customers before developing your idea and must perform one or more concept
tests. See the associated note for more
details.
GRADING
The grades will be weighted as follows:
|
|
Conjoint Analysis Project Conjoint Analysis Forecasting Project Multidimensional Scaling Project Pivot Table Project New Product Development Project Class Participation |
5% 5% 5% 5% 40% 40% |
MATERIALS
A photocopied
textbook and a case packet are available in the bookstore.
DATA PROVISION
In addition to the academic work described above,
students are required to spend about an hour participating in a consumer
research study. This task is viewed as
a course requirement and may contribute toward the student's understanding of
data collection and manipulation techniques discussed in the course.
COURSE
OUTLINE
|
Wed Aug 21 |
Discussion:
Introduction |
|
|
i. Introduction to course ii. Primary
causes of new product failure iii. New
product development process |
|
Read: |
Chapter 1 - Introduction to New Product Development. |
|
Mon Aug 26 |
Topic: New Product Development Process |
|
Case: |
Associated Instruments Corporation: Analytic
Instrument Division 9-689-052 |
|
Questions: |
1.
Summarize the
major events in the 77000 project up to this point. How well has that project been managed so far? What did the
team do right and wrong? 2.
What has been the
role of management and the various functional areas in the project? What was done well and what could have
been done better? 3.
What should
Hoffenberger do about the issues facing him? Specifically what decisions
should be made about price, injection molding, value analysis, and extended
warranty. |
|
Assume: |
To simplify and standardize calculations, assume 1987
annual market share will decrease by 0.2% every month that a new product is
not on the market (e.g., a market share loss of .6% for a three month delay),
but 1988 market share will be unaffected, i.e. no gain as suggested on page
16, note A.1.b. |
|
Wed Aug 28 |
Discussion: Strategic Focus
|
|
Read: |
Chapter 3 -
Strategic Concerns: Focus |
Wed Sept 4 |
Topic: Product Platforms and Aggregate Product Plans |
|
Case: |
We've
Got Rhythm! Medtronic Corporation's Cardiac Pacemaker Business 9-698-004 |
|
Questions: |
1.
Review
Medtronic's history. What were the
root causes of its troubles? 2.
Describe
Medtronic's current new product development process. Which of the
improvements in the product development process were most instrumental in
turning the company around? 3.
What elements of
Medtronic's approach could be applied in other businesses? 4.
Evaluate the
nature of senior management in the implementation of the product development
system. Where does top management
need to be intimately involved? |
|
Mon Sept 9 |
Team work day: Project Planning |
|
Wed Sept 11 |
Discussion: Concept Generation - Search for New
Product Ideas: |
|
Read: |
Chapter 4 - Concept
Generation |
|
Mon Sept 16 |
Discussion:
Project Planning and Idea Generation |
|
Wed Sept 18 |
Project
meetings - Project Planning and Preliminary Analysis |
|
Assignment: |
|
|
Mon Sept 23 |
Topic: Consumer Behavior |
|
Case: |
Consumer Behavior Exercise (A - F) 9-596-039 -
9-596-044 |
|
Questions: |
Conduct a 30 to 60 minute depth interview on the
product and topic assigned to you.
Summarize your interview in one or two pages. |
|
Wed Sept 25 |
Topic: |
|
Case: |
IDEO Product
Development 9-600-143 |
|
Questions: |
1.
How would you
characterize IDEO’s process, organization, culture and management? 2.
Should IDEO
accept the Visor project as it is (on a dramatically reduced schedule)?
Should it try to persuade Handspring’s management to change its aggressive
launch schedule? Or should it simply decline the project? Consider this from
both the IDEO and Handspring perspectives. |
|
Mon Sept 30 |
Discussion:
Search for New Product Ideas: Conjoint Analysis |
|
Read: |
Chapter 6 - Conjoint Analysis |
|
|
Pivot Table Assignment is Due Today |
|
Wed Oct 2 |
Discussion: Search for New Product Ideas:
Multidimensional Scaling |
|
Read: |
Chapter 5 - MDS |
|
Mon Oct 7 |
Case:
Conjoint Analysis |
|
Case: |
Clark Material Handling Group-Overseas: Brazilian
Product Strategy (A) and (B) Condensed 9-590-081 |
|
Questions: |
1.
What decisions
did Richards need to make? 2.
What was learned
from the research reported in the first 12 Exhibits (i.e., everything prior
to the follow-up simulations discussed on page 10 of the case)? What would
you do based on this information? 3.
What do the
simulations suggest Clark should do? 4.
If Hyster had
access to the same simulations, what would it do? 5.
How have the
simulations expanded the value of the report? |
|
Wed Oct 9 |
Discussion:
Concept Tests |
|
Read: |
Chapter 8 -
Concept and Product Testing |
|
Assignment Due: |
Final Conjoint Assignment is Due today. |
|
Mon
Oct 14 |
Topic: Concept and
Product Testing |
|
Case: |
General Foods Post Division (A) 9-510-008 |
|
Questions: |
1.
What was known
about PC-33 going into each test? What were the major unknowns? What should GF try to learn from each
test? 2.
What did GF learn
from each test? What changes should GF have made to each test? 3.
What should GF do
now? Are the potential economics of
the business good enough to justify continued effort? What market share is needed to earn a
reasonable profit? |
|
Wed
Oct 16 |
Discussion.
Concept testing for your projects |
|
Mon
Oct 21 |
Team meetings |
Wed
Oct 23
|
Topic: Managing Product Development Projects |
|
Case: |
NEC 9-693-095 |
|
Questions: |
1.
How successful
has NEC's packaging engineering group been?
What is it doing right? Where does it need to improve? 2.
How is the
industry evolving and how will this affect the packaging group? 3.
Construct a
development schedule through 2000 and allocate people across projects NEC
should undertake. Assume that head count will grow no faster than in the
past. |
|
Read: |
“Where No Computer Has
Gone Before," Business Week, Nov 25, 1991 and "Call it
Superbig Blue," Business Week, June 29, 1992. |
|
Mon Oct 28 |
Discussion: Product Planning and Setting Product
Specifications |
|
Read: |
Chapter 7 -
Product Planning |
|
Assignment: |
Final MDS Assignment is
Due today. |
|
Wed Oct 30 |
Topic: Product Planning |
|
Case: |
Citibank: Launching the Credit Card in Asia Pacific
(A) 9-595-026 |
|
Questions: |
1.
Should Citibank
launch the card product? If you do not introduce the card, what would you do? 2.
How should it be
positioned? 3.
What countries
should it enter and in what order? How should Rana Talwar market the card internally? |
|
Assumptions: |
To increase comparability of analysis, assume 1) the
approximately $60 cost per acquisition in Table A holds for all countries, 2)
the $25 cost per card in the next to the last line on page 9 is really
cost per customer, and 3) the revenue per customer shown in Table B
holds for those same income classes in other countries. |
|
Mon Nov 4 |
Discussion Sales Forecasting and Planning |
|
Read: |
Chapter 8 Concept and
Product Testing (pp1-4) Nestlé Refrigerated
Foods 9-595-035 pp 5- 9 (first paragraph) and related tables. Chapter 2 Product and Market
Evolution (pp.22-26) |
|
Wed Nov 6 |
Discussion: Marketing Plans for projects |
|
Mon Nov 11 |
Project Meetings -
Design Review |
|
Wed
Nov 13 |
Topic: Sales Forecasting
with Trial and Repeat Models |
|
Case: |
Nestlé
Refrigerated Foods 9-595-035 |
|
Questions: |
1.
Using the BASES
model in Exhibit 9, forecast sales for the two pizza options. Notice that the top box scores are very
different for Contadina users and non-users. On page 14, Nestlé's MRD
cautions that parent brand usage may vary from 5% to 25%. Make forecasts based on several
penetration scenarios. 2.
What do you learn
from all of the other exhibits? Is
this a good opportunity? What are the
strengths and weaknesses of the pizza concept? 3.
How would you
compare the pizza opportunity to the pasta opportunity? Why was the pasta so successful? 4.
Would you launch
the pizza? |
|
Mon Nov 18 |
Discussion: Managing Development |
|
Read: |
Chapter 10 |
|
Wed Nov 20 |
Topic: Planning
Development |
|
Case: |
BMW AG: The Digital Auto Project (A) 9-699-044 |
Questions: |
1.
What are the
competitive challenges in the automobile industry in 1997 and beyond? How is
BMW affected? 2.
How has BMW's
product development process evolved? Why does BMW's management feel there is
a need to slash development time by 50%? 3.
Is senior
management giving the organization enough time to carry out these changes or
is it moving too slowly? What are the risks of moving too quickly or too
slowly? 4.
As Peter Ratz,
what would you recommend? Provide specific recommendations regarding BMW's
styling process and the role that CAS should play? |
Mon Nov 25 |
Discussion: Product and Market Evolution |
|
Read: |
Chapter 2 - Product Evolution (pp. 1-22) |
|
Wed Nov 27 |
Topic: Product Planning and Forecasting - a Technical
Innovation |
|
Case: |
Rogers Communications, Inc.: The Wave 9-597-050 |
|
Questions: |
1.
How does the
convergence of television, telephone, and computing affect the future of
cable television and Rogers? What benefits will convergence deliver? To whom will it deliver them? 2.
What is the
likely size of the market for high speed Web access in Newmarket over the
next three years? On what factors
does your forecast depend? 3.
What should
Roger's introductory strategy and budget be? |
Mon Dec 2 |
Topic: Managing Development:
Different Contexts |
Case: |
Living on Internet Time: Product
Development at Netscape, Microsoft, Yahoo!, and NetDynamics 9-697-052 |
Questions |
1.
What are the
similarities and differences between the four approaches to product
development? What drives these
differences? 2.
A friend has come
up with a great video game idea. The
game is aimed at high school and college students and allows them to play
against opponents on the Internet.
The software would allow them to build cities in cyberspace, trade
with each other, wage war, and engage in a variety of other activities. Your friend has experience in writing
game software, but would like you to design a process for taking the idea to
market. Assume that you have funding
to hire enough (12 or so) software developers, and any equipment you might
reasonably need. You should specify the sequence of
project phases, gates, and milestones, as well as any specific methodologies
(user needs, contextual analysis, etc.) that you think you should use. Your process design should define the
sequence of major activities. This
should be sketched on a piece of paper. |
Wed Dec 4 |
Discussion: Summary |
|
Finals Week |
Design
Fair Wed Dec 12, 8:00-10:00AM or Thurs Dec 13, 10:30AM – 12:30PM |